Persuasive Research Paper W/Outline

I. Thesis A. It seems that recently, the healthcare system has been placing labels on the values of lives. Doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies are separating patients on the sole bases of their finances. In these situations, individuals with health insurance are receiving priority care over those without health insurance. Doctors and hospitals are increasing waiting times of those without insurance, to take advantage of those with insurance. In addition to doubled-waiting times, these uninsured patients are even forced to take lower grades of medication.

This isn’t only unfair, but inhumane, displaying the belief that these charity care patients’ lives aren’t as valuable as those with insurance. These actions seem ironic in a nation that believes in equal rights. Placing a price or level of importance on a human being’s life is heartless, greedy, and hypocritical. To reckon the significance of a person’s life due to their ability to pay hospital their medical bills…(to be continued). II. My Opinion A. Placing a price or level of importance on a human being’s life is heartless, greedy, and hypocritical.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

A person’s financial ranking should not determine their entitlement to a fine quality of life. Who are doctors and other health representatives to determine the importance of a person’s life? Doctors aren’t the birth creators of their patients, so they definitely aren’t entitled to establish their life’s value. III. The Oppositions A. Some may argue that insured patients deserve priority care over those without health insurance because insured patients have payments to the hospital. The question is: Should we neglect other human beings just because they aren’t able to pay for their care?

This act wouldn’t only be unfair but inhumane because the healthcare system would be placing values on the lives of human beings. It is illegal to buy babies, basically making it illegal to price human beings as if they are items. So why are hospitals and doctors allowed to price the lives of their patients? Labeling categories of people as less important than others, over a matter of dollars should be illegal. B. When approaching equal value of healthcare, it’s necessary to consider the costs and figures associated with caring for patients.

Insured patients are usually only face paying co-pays and fees after their hospitalizations. The Price of Life It seems that recently, the healthcare system has been placing labels on the values of lives. Doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies are separating patients on the sole bases of their finances. In these situations, individuals with health insurance are receiving priority care over those without health insurance. Doctors and hospitals are increasing waiting times of those without insurance, to take advantage of those with insurance.

In addition to doubled-waiting times, these uninsured patients are even forced to take lower grades of medication. This isn’t only unfair, but inhumane, displaying the belief that these charity care patients’ lives aren’t as valuable as those with insurance. These actions seem ironic in a nation that believes in equal rights. Placing a price or level of importance on a human being’s life is heartless, greedy, and hypocritical. In a country of liberal rights, a person’s financial ranking should not determine their entitlement to a fine quality of life.

Money, insurance, or figures should never decide the fate of a human being’s life. Who are doctors and other healthcare representatives to determine the importance of a person’s life? Doctors aren’t the birth creators of their patients, so they definitely aren’t entitled to establish the value of their patients’ lives. When doctors aren’t absolutely neglecting patients, they’re giving discriminatory levels of treatment to uninsured and insured patients, this can apply to care and forms of medicines these patients are prescribed.

Healthcare discrimination is absolutely vile and unfair because an individual’s competence to afford health insurance should never determine their life’s value. It has been estimated that about 43 million Americans are living without health insurance (msnbc. com). This means that $43 million Americans are quietly going sick to avoid paying harsh hospital bills. The only question that one can ask is, why? Why are so many of our children and elderly going sick without care or cures? The answer is fear.

Fear of harsh treatment and unfair, hiked hospital bills. In 2004, MSNBC stated that financial experts told lawmakers that hospitals normally charged uninsured patients up to four time mores that they charge insured patients. This can possibly be due to the fact that uninsured patients don’t have advocates to argue health care bills like insured patients do. Therefore, to compensate for their lost profits on insured patients, doctors over charge the people that can’t afford it the most.

In addition to those that over charge customers without insurance, other health care facilities require them to pre-pay for the costs of their treatments and diagnoses. Uninsured Americans are usually those without adequate finances to pay for medical insurance plans; therefore, overcharging and pre-charging these helpless people should be an illegal act. After these uninsured patients have been over charged, their next worry is whether they will receive the proper level of treatment. Uninsured patients are subject to longer waiting times in doctor’s offices, dental offices, and even emergency rooms.

Although some institutions may not deliberately force uninsured patients to suffer longer waiting times than those that are insured, they are the same facilities that take their sweet time to process dozens of forms that state the same things: NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION, ILLNESSES, INSURANCE PROVIDER. This delay of paperwork is absolutely unnecessary and may even be strategic on the behalf the hospitals that hope these uninsured patients get frustrated and change their minds about seeing a doctor. This act should be illegal but not only is it unfair but can cause unnecessary deaths.

Some may argue that insured patients deserve priority care over those without health insurance because insured patients have guaranteed payments to the hospital. The question is: Should we neglect other human beings just because they aren’t able to pay for their care? This act wouldn’t only be unfair but inhumane because the healthcare system would be placing values on the lives of human beings. It is illegal to buy babies, basically making it illegal to price human beings as if they are items. So why are hospitals and doctors allowed to price the lives of their patients?

Labeling categories of people as less important than others, over a matter of dollars is inhumane and heartless. From September until a few weeks ago, I have been volunteering my time at an afterschool program as a part of my school’s community service obligation. At the YWCA afterschool program, I work as a tutor, assisting children from the ages of five through eleven with their homework and study habits. After my research, I pondered what the results would be if the YWCA practiced the same system as hospitals. This system would be valuing the education of each child solely on their finances.

What if I was required to give a higher level of tutoring to certain students due to the fact that their parents paid more for aftercare? In this situation, I would be the doctor that spends more time and gives better care to my patients because they have insurance. In doing so, I would neglect my little uninsured patients while devoting more of my knowledge and compassion to the insured students. This would eventually cause an obvious difference in their grades, where my favored tutees would achieve better test and homework grades, while my neglected students would fall behind.

Essentially my purpose as a tutor wouldn’t be productive in any sense other than discriminating and segregating the level of service these children receive. As a former public school student, I cannot help but be appalled at this contemplation. Segregating the right to an education goes against every belief that education amounts to freedom, therefore segregating healthcare should be equally dismaying. In the Gospel of Luke, Luke writes about Jesus in the light of a healer and helper to wounded and helpless.

Throughout this particular book of the Bible, Luke makes numerous accounts of Jesus providing miracles to the people of his land. Jesus even sent twelve apostles out to educate people on the Gospel and to cure illnesses. Jesus and the apostles were no less than impartial when approaching the healing of each individual they helped. “And he called the twelve together and gave them power and authority over all demons and to cure diseases. . . ” (Luke 9:1) This quote supports that regardless of attire or riches, Jesus and his apostles cured everyone that needed healing.

During that era, medicines for harsh conditions didn’t even exist making Jesus the only hope for some of the ill. Similar to today’s society, many doctors do not exist, making every single one very significant to their region. In the Gospel, Jesus didn’t turn away anyone that asked him for curing, so why do the only people with the proper power and knowledge to cure and heal turn away thousands of patients daily? In the Hippocratic Oath, which every practicing physician must recite and swear by, it states that doctors will never turn away anyone ill or in need of medical help.

After reading this entire oath, I couldn’t help but ask why these handsomely paid physicians that are refusing to see the uninsured and ordering the prepayment of medical expenses? In contrast to the impartial and indiscriminative Jesus, these doctors seem more harmful than helpful in the medical field. When approaching the value of healthcare, it’s necessary to consider the costs and figures associated with caring for patients. Insured patients are usually only faced with paying co-pays and fees after their hospitalizations, while uninsured patients are billed for the cost of their entire hospitalization.

Paying for these thousand dollar plus bills can often be difficult for individuals without jobs or occupations that provide health insurance. To help assist folks in these circumstances, our government as well as private organizations, established charities to pay for these expenses. A well-minded person would consider this a great benefit to citizens of the United States. However, there are millions of individuals who believe that the money spent on these organizations could be used in other ways. They believe that these financially incompetent individuals should be forced to pay for their own bills.

The question that this belief raises is: Should these uninsured patients reject treatments due to the fact that they aren’t able to pay for their own medical bills? The average cost of a short stay treatment at a hospital is $3,062 and $4,382 for a long stay treatment (sciencedirect. com) These figures can intimidate the financially disadvantaged, making them avoid seeking the proper care for their sicknesses and those that don’t decide to neglect their illnesses will put off their treatment until they can accumulate enough money to pay for their medical expenses.

This will only lead to more deaths, and for our financially concerned opposers, more national debts. This will contribute to the loss of workers for our workplaces, eventually the loss of more businesses, and ultimately a fall in our economy. Charity care agencies are beneficial to our entire country, even to those that are insured. Other people that disagree with charity care are concerned about the uninsured individuals that take advantage of the charity healthcare system. Certain uninsured patients that don’t pay for their own health expenses actually remain unemployed only continue receiving charity healthcare.

This is extremely unfair to the taxpayers of this country and to the other people that need charity care programs to help pay for their medical costs. When dissecting this issue, we must take a look at the United States’ entire approach on welfare and the millions of people that strategically quit jobs, remain unemployed, or remain in low paying jobs just to be supported by the government. After calculating the millions of dollars lost to these welfare abusers, should we cut welfare aid to everyone in the United States? The solution in a cruel America would be to cut aid to veterans, struggling families, and the disabled.

This ridiculous idea would not only be unfair but against every policy this country stands for. Physicians, hospitals, and healthcare officials need to be seized and better regulated by the United States government. Establishing a merit system for patients with or without insurance literally denounces every belief of equality that we have in our country. While these hospitals may think they’re helping, in reality they are harming. They’re harming the health and peace of mind of each of the 43 million Americans of the United States.

Each day mothers, fathers, sisters, and sons are dying due to lack of equal healthcare. Indirectly our physicians and healthcare advisors are murdering innocent, helpless individuals. The balance of one’s bank account, occupation, or any other means of financial privileges shouldn’t be the deciding factor in whether one lives or dies. Higher medical bills, pre-charged payments, and treatment favoring is merciless, heartless, and should be made illegal. Works Cited MacMann, Patti. “Insured vs Uninsured – The Segregation of American Health Care.

” EzineArticles Submission – Submit Your Best Quality Original Articles For Massive Exposure, Ezine Publishers Get 25 Free Article Reprints. 2007. Web. 5 Dec. 2010. . “Thoracic Surgery Clinics. ” ScienceDirect – Home. 2010. Web. 5 Dec. 2010. . “Uninsured Patients Pay More for Care. ” Breaking News, Weather, Business, Health, Entertainment, Sports, Politics, Travel, Science, Technology, Local, US & World News- Msnbc. com. 24 June 2004. Web. 6 Dec. 2010. . Weber, Gerard P. , and Robert L. Miller. Breaking Open the Gospel of Luke. Cincinnati, OH: St. Anthony Messenger, 1990. Print.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

x

Hi!
I'm Kyle!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out